Introduction
When Framer made major changes to its price system in 2025, the user community reacted strongly, especially agencies and professional designers. Many customers believe that the new price model lacks understanding of business needs, even though Framer remains a great platform for quick design-to-live processes, animations, and adaptable component systems.
Additional capabilities like multi-language support, additional editor seats, and site redirects—all crucial for professional-caliber websites—will incur separate fees under Framer's new structure. Users who oversee bigger, more complicated projects are concerned about these add-ons because they significantly raise the total cost.
Framer Pricing
Framer's personal plans are intended for freelancers and independent designers handling smaller projects:
$5 per month for the Mini Plan
$15 per month for the basic plan
$30 per month for the Pro Plan
This plan includes a single webpage, one editor seat ( extra editors $20/month for each) and for $15/month, you can add one more language.
Agencies and expanding companies with more complicated requirements are served by Framer's business plans. For $75 per month, you have the startup plan that includes three editor seats, but if you want an additional one, it costs $40 per month. You also have up to five locations supported; each costs $40 per month. Each site is limited to 100 redirects.
Framer has a second business plan, Scaleup Plan, which costs $200 per month and has a custom proxy setup option for advanced hosting solutions, and you are allowed to redirect 500 times.
Framer's monthly cost might rise significantly due to its heavy reliance on add-ons:
Translations: Even if they are done manually, other languages have an additional cost.
Editor Seats: In addition to the editors that are already included, each additional editor needs a separate subscription.
Redirects: Unless consumers improve their subscription, sites are only allowed a certain number of redirects.
Custom Proxy Setup: Designed for enterprise use cases, this feature is exclusive to higher-tier plans.
Community Reactions
Framer's price structure modifications have not gone ignored. Agencies and companies that operate in multilingual areas have expressed concerns, as have longtime users. In conversations on the Framer Community Forum and Reddit, individuals frequently bring up the following problems:
Translation Costs: Paying $40 for each extra language is harsh in places like Belgium, where bilingual websites are required, particularly when customers perform translations by hand rather than using Framer's AI capabilities.
Editor Access Fees: It is common practice to have numerous editors in real-world team situations. Comparing Framer's pay-per-editor business to rivals that include many editors in their plans, it feels expensive and constrictive.
Limitations on Redirects: To keep SEO results high after a website migration, hundreds of redirects are frequently needed. It is believed that the Startup plan's 100 redirect cap is insufficient for professional use.
Prioritizing AI Features: According to many customers, Framer is focusing on dazzling AI technologies like automated page creation while ignoring essential business features like team management, SEO optimization, and site scalability.
Framer vs Webflow
The market that Framer and Webflow cater to is similar—creative individuals, agencies, and companies creating cutting-edge websites without code—but they take entirely different approaches to features and pricing.
In terms of providing a very quick and adaptable design-to-live-site experience, Framer is exceptional. Strong animation skills, pixel-perfect responsiveness, and cutting-edge AI-powered capabilities like localization and automatic content creation are all available. But there's a cost to these advantages. Costs increase quickly as teams and projects grow because of additional editing fees, limited redirection, and additional language requirements. For designers who prioritize creative autonomy and quick prototyping, Framer is perfect; nevertheless, it loses appeal for larger, content-driven, or SEO-focused projects.
Webflow, on the other hand, is designed with scalable site management in mind. Its plans offer robust SEO help, ample content management tools, and the capacity to manage bigger teams without incurring unnecessarily high additional expenses. Redirects and editor access are frequently unrestricted in Webflow, or at the very least, far more flexible in ordinary plans. Because of this, Webflow is more desirable to agencies, marketing departments, and companies who value content, SEO, and long-term scalability above cutting-edge design capabilities.
In the end, Framer excels in highly interactive and design-forward projects, but Webflow is typically a better option for clients who require huge, dynamic websites with integrated collaboration and SEO features.
Conclusions
Framer wants to be at the forefront of design and AI integration, which is reflected in their 2025 price change. The hefty price of key business capabilities makes it a difficult option for agencies, SEO-driven websites, or multilingual projects, even though it's still a fantastic tool for individuals or small teams that value visual design and quick deployment.
Framer will continue to be appealing to users who want creativity without sacrificing utility. But those that need to work across teams and scale effectively might find Webflow's more inclusive and predictable price structure more suitable. Future price adjustments may need to place less emphasis on basic capabilities and more on matching the pragmatic requirements of professional web teams if Framer is to properly satisfy its expanding user base.
